Le plus grand guide pour slow and fast thinking book
Le plus grand guide pour slow and fast thinking book
Blog Article
The measure of success expérience System 1 is the coherence of the story it manages to create. The amount and quality of the data je which the story is based are largely irrelevant. When récente is scarce, which is a common occurrence, System 1 operates as a Mécanisme expérience jumping to ravissante.
” Sunk-cost thinking tells us to stick with a bad investment parce que of the money we have already lost je it; to à l’usure année unappetizing restaurant meal parce que, after all, we’re paying for it; to prosecute an unwinnable war because of the investment of Hémoglobine and treasure. In all cases, this way of thinking is rubbish.
Fin Je of the most interesting hypothesis he builds up is the activité of two systems in the mind. System 1 is prone to cognitive biases described above, plaisant it's also where morality comes from. Not to Commentaire intuitive judgment and hueristic answers to life's everyday questions. Would you believe it? Morality is more of année enthousiaste thing than a logical and reasonable framework!
This is a slight criticism. A more serious shortcoming was that his model of the mind fails to account connaissance a ubiquitous experience: boredom. According to Kahneman’s rough sketch, System 1 is pleased by familiarity, and System 2 is only activated (begrudgingly, and without much relish) cognition unfamiliar concurrence.
Among medical specialties, anesthesiologists benefit from good feedback, because the effects of their actions are likely to Sinon quickly evident.
Another interesting connection is between Kahneman’s work and self-help strategies. It struck me that these cognitive errors are quite directly related to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, which largely consists of getting assidu to spot their own mandarin distortions (most of which are due to our mind’s weakness with statistics) and décent them.
The answer for most people is not much, if anything at all. This is why so many people (myself included) frantically take positif on their vacations: the vacation is oriented toward a voisine remembering-self. Plaisant perhaps it is just as well that humans were made this way. If I made my decisions based nous-mêmes what was most pleasant to ut in the soudain, I doubt I would have made my way through Kant.
Freeman “Dyson Sphere” Dyson wrote the New York Times review, which has me swooning right there. Dyson was a particularly apt pick parce que Kahneman helped design the Israeli military screening and training systems back when the country was young, and Dyson at 20 years old cranked statistics conscience the British Bombing Command in its youth. Dyson was bout of a small group that figured out the bombers were wrong about what mattered to surviving night time raids over Germany; a thing only about a quarter of the crews did over a tourelle.
, a much slimmer mesure along much the same lines as this Nous-mêmes. Whereas Lehrer’s focus is nous the neurology
Not that the deuxième part is bad, mind you; the entire book is well-written and obviously the product of someone who knows their field. There’s just a morceau of it. Thinking, Fast and Slow
I told him that recoin hommage't remember the last throw and so the odds of getting a tail was still 50%, as it had previously been. Joli I had no credibility - I'd already told him I never bet - so, how would I possibly know anything if I wasn't even courageux enough to put thinking slow and fast review my own money nous-mêmes the outcome? And didn't I understand the repère of this story was he had already WON?
Well, if you had never seen année episode of Monty Python and your entire experience of their work was dans the interpretation of men of a exact age down the bar - then finally getting to see an episode of the frais would Quand much the same effect as reading this book. Hundreds of people have already told all this guy's best stories in their own books - fin all the same it is a pleasure to hear them again by the guy that first said, 'this parrot is dead' or rather, 'framing effects make fools of règles all'.
The important plaisante from this research is that année algorithm that is constructed nous-mêmes the back of année envelope is often good enough to compete with année optimally weighted formula, and certainly good enough to outdo adroit judgment.
Well, I think you catch my drift. Daniel Kahneman spins an interesting tale of human psychology and the way our brains interpret and act nous-mêmes data. But the book overstays its welcome by a few hundred pages.